Trump says Jan 6 committee could hurt presidency in search of its records


Trump is appealing a lower court ruling that his files should be turned over to the committee. The Biden administration and the US House are united in opposing the former president’s efforts to keep the files secret, arguing that more than 700 pages, including White House call logs and notes from his senior advisers, should be available for investigation.

A federal appeals court will hear oral argument on November 30 in this landmark case.

“The manifest contempt of those called upon for President Trump leads them to adopt a course of conduct which will result in permanent damage to the institution of the presidency,” Trump’s lawyers wrote in their brief in response to the Court on Wednesday. call from DC.

“A current president cannot destroy the confidentiality of executive branch communications and the important trust interests attached to this confidentiality for his own political advantage to the detriment of his predecessors and successors,” they continued.

The Biden administration has refused to assert executive privilege over records, and Trump argues that this could mean future presidents decide to violate White House confidentiality if their predecessors belong to another political party.
The Biden administration has argued that whatever documents Trump tries to keep secret will ultimately be made public, as part of the National Archives’ approach to historical documents, and that while some documents may be privileged, the House Blanche believes there is an “extraordinary” need for transparency when it comes to January 6.
Federal trial court judge Tanya Chutkan ruled against Trump earlier this month, saying he does not have the power to override the decisions of the current administration.

Trump, now pleading in appeals court above her, says he should win the case and block the House committee as a “constitutional guarantee” and as a way to protect the president’s executive privilege . He is also again asking the court to examine his presidency’s documents page by page to determine what should remain protected – an approach that would almost certainly drag out the production of documents for months, if not years.

“The specific analysis to determine whether each recording is properly performable must be done document by document, and not by the dispersed approach advocated by the Appeals and the district court,” Trump’s lawyers wrote on Wednesday.

The three-judge appeal panel that will hear the case is already calling this approach into question. After receiving the first set of written legal briefs in the case, they asked on Tuesday whether the lawyers involved could address in their oral argument whether the court has the capacity to intervene in the dispute.

Source link

About Author

Comments are closed.