Rand Paul: Fauci intimidates scientists into contradicting him because “he controls all the funding”

0

Scientists with different opinions on the origins of COVID-19 than Dr Anthony Fauci keep it to themselves because the best disease expert controls so much of their funding, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, told ” Fox News Primetime ”Tuesday night.

Paul subjected Fauci to harsh questioning during a Senate hearing chaired by Democrat Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota earlier today, with Fauci questioning Paul’s definition of office-based research, which he said the legislator, came from a document from another epidemiological expert.

The senator then urged Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy & Infectious Disease, to reconsider previous testimony denying the specific fundraising efforts of the NIAID or NIH at the Wuhan lab; where many believe COVID-19 originated – citing federal perjury laws.

Paul reacted more to Fauci’s behavior and doubled down on his claim that the 80-year-old Brooklyn, NY native is not saying as much as he should be on the subject of funding research on the gain of function.

He said he read aloud the NIH definition of gain-of-function research, as well as a scientific article by an expert in cell biology working at Rutgers University in New Jersey, which described the work of the Dr Shi Zhengli, head of the Wuhan laboratory, as the manual definition of such an experiment.

“All Dr Fauci could do was mumble and call me a liar – but at no point did he address the facts we exposed that the money he was giving in Wuhan was indeed intended for a gain in function. “

Paul pointed out that he is one of the few leading medical experts – as a doctor himself – to speak out and contradict Fauci’s claim that many other doctors depend on funding from the NIAID – over which Fauci has the final say.

The senator noted that Fauci had worked at the NIH based in Bethesda, Maryland, since 1968. He was appointed head of NIAID by President Reagan in 1984.

Host Brian Kilmeade went on to note that Johns Hopkins doctor Dr. Marty Makary told him on the “Brian Kilmeade Show” earlier today that the NIH handed out $ 40 billion in research grants in 2020. – but less than half of one-percent went to COVID-related efforts.

Makary said Fauci should be ashamed of this statistic, and Kilmeade asked Paul why there wasn’t more outrage overall within the medical community:

“He was [at NIH] for 40 years; probably 39 years too old. But he controls all the funding, ”Paul warned.

“So people have a deadly fear of him. Researchers will not speak out. Why weren’t there other scientists?”

Paul said he receives letters from scientists who routinely contradict Fauci’s prescriptions and public statements, but all of them offer the same regret: that they are afraid to speak out against what the health bureaucrat says.

“They are very suspicious of what he says. They think he doesn’t make sense and doesn’t read science accurately,” Paul said.

“They’re afraid to speak up because a lot of them are university scientists and they depend on NIH funds: crossing it means it’s the last money you’ll get.”

Paul said Fauci had a “significant conflict of interest” in the Wuhan case because he was “at the top of the food chain” in distributing funds and now claims that none of this has gone. to the dangerous research on the gain of function.

“All he’s saying is oh, well, research doesn’t meet our definition anymore,” he said. “He dances around the truth. Why? Because if this disease came from the lab and they were funding the job gain, guess what? There is at the very least moral guilt for the start of the pandemic.”

Paul added that in 2012, Fauci made statements about the potential for a pandemic lab leak and that if such a situation did occur, the research would be worth it.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In the paper Fauci prepared that year, he defended controversial gain-of-function research, saying the “benefits” from the science “outweigh the risk” of an accidental pandemic.

“A pandemic is more likely to occur in the wild, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that may seem risky,” the newspaper said.

At the hearing on Tuesday, Fauci responded to Paul’s claims by saying he denies them and “resents” them.

Fox News’ Houston Keene contributed to this report.

Source link
Share.

About Author

Leave A Reply