BOSTON- Observational research has suggested that light alcohol consumption may have beneficial effects on heart health, but in a great study Posted in Open JAMA Network, alcohol consumption at all levels was associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease. The findings, which are published by a team led by researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, suggest that the supposed benefits of alcohol consumption may in fact be attributed to other lifestyle factors that are common between light and alcohol. moderate drinkers.
The study included 371,463 adults – with an average age of 57 and an average alcohol consumption of 9.2 drinks per week – who participated in the UK Biobank, a large-scale biomedical database and resource research containing in-depth genetic and health information. Consistent with previous studies, researchers found that light to moderate drinkers had the lowest risk of heart disease, followed by people who abstained from drinking. People who drank heavily had the highest risk. However, the team also found that light to moderate drinkers tended to have healthier lifestyles than abstainers, such as more physical activity and vegetable consumption, and less smoking. Consideration of a few lifestyle factors significantly reduces the benefits associated with alcohol consumption.
The study also applied the latest techniques in a method called Mendelian randomization, which uses genetic variants to determine whether an observed link between an exposure and an outcome is consistent with a causal effect – in this case, if light consumption of ‘alcohol causes a person to protect against cardiovascular disease. “Newer and more advanced techniques of ‘nonlinear Mendelian randomization’ now make it possible to use human genetic data to assess the direction and magnitude of disease risk associated with different levels of exposure,” says the lead author. Krishna G. Aragam, MD, MS, MGH Cardiologist and Broad Institute Research Fellow. “We therefore leveraged these novel techniques and extensive genetic and phenotypic data from biobank populations to better understand the association between habitual alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease.”
When scientists performed such genetic analyzes of samples taken from participants, they found that people with genetic variants that predicted higher alcohol consumption were indeed more likely to consume greater amounts of alcohol. and more likely to suffer from hypertension and coronary heart disease. The analyzes also revealed substantial differences in cardiovascular risk across the spectrum of alcohol consumption in men and women, with minimal increases in risk from zero to seven drinks per week, higher when going from seven to 14 drinks per week, and a particularly high risk when drinking 21 or more drinks per week. Notably, the results suggest increased cardiovascular risk even at levels deemed “low risk” by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s national guidelines (i.e., less than two drinks a day for men and a glass per day for women).
The finding that the relationship between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular risk is not linear but rather exponential was supported by further analysis of data from 30,716 participants at the Mass General Brigham Biobank. Therefore, although reducing intake may benefit even people who drink one alcoholic beverage per day, the health benefits of reducing may be more substantial – and, perhaps, more clinically significant – in those who consume more.
“The findings affirm that alcohol consumption should not be recommended for improving cardiovascular health; rather, that reducing alcohol consumption will likely reduce cardiovascular risk in all individuals, although to varying degrees depending on their current level of consumption,” says Aragam.
The study’s lead author was Kiran J. Biddinger, and other authors included Connor A. Emdin, MD, DPhil, Mary E. Haas, PhD, Minxian Wang, PhD, George Hindy, MD, Patrick T. Ellinor , MD, PhD, Sekar Kathiresan, MD, and Amit V. Khera, MD, MSc.
Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association.
About Massachusetts General Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital, founded in 1811, is Harvard Medical School’s first and largest teaching hospital. the Mass General Research Institute conducts the largest hospital-based research program in the nation, with annual research operations of more than $1 billion and includes more than 9,500 researchers working in more than 30 institutes, centers and departments. In August 2021, Mass General was named #5 in the US News and World Report list of “America’s Best Hospitals”.
Newspaper
Open JAMA Network
Research method
Data/statistical analysis
Research subject
People
The title of the article
Association between habitual alcohol consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease
Publication date of articles
25-mar-2022
Conflict of Interest Statement
Dr. Haas reported receiving personal fees and stock and stock options from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. Dr. Ellinor said he received grants from Bayer AG and IBM Health and personal fees from Bayer AG, MyoKardia, Quest Diagnostics and Novartis while conducting the study. Dr. Kathiresan said he is an employee of Verve Therapeutics; hold shares in Verve Therapeutics, Maze Therapeutics, Color Health and Medgenome; receive personal fees from Medgenome and Color Health; serve on the advisory boards of the Regeneron Genetics Center and Corvidia Therapeutics; and consulting for Acceleron, Eli Lilly and Co, Novartis, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novo Ventures, Ionis, Alnylam, Aegerion, Haug Partners, Noble Insights, Leerink Partners, Bayer Healthcare, Illumina, Color Genomics, MedGenome, Quest Diagnostics and Medscape in outside of the submitted work. Dr. Khera said he received personal fees from Merck, Amarin Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Maze Therapeutics, Navitor Pharmaceuticals, Sarepta Therapeutics, Verve Therapeutics, Silence Therapeutics, Veritas International, Color Health and Third Rock Ventures and received grants from IBM Research outside of submitted work. Dr. Aragam said he received speaker fees from the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research. No other disclosures were reported.
Warning: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of press releases posted on EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.